The psychological barrier to entry is the perceived value an investor is getting for his or her money based on the actual dollar price per unit of the investment that they are buying and nothing else. Recently and more notably, the Crypto Alt Coin market took this concept by the balls and applied it harder than the investors that bought into these coins applied to Wendy's a few months after making their initial purchase. these people are just oblivious and fell for the psychological barrier to entry coupled with the return solely based on future price.

It is working and you got bonus points for wasting my time. If this is some psyop narrative being pushed by hedgies - congratz. Sure you have more shares of company A, but your equity ownership in both companies is the same. If you buy $10 worth of stock in both, you get 10 shares of company A and 5 shares of company B. If company A has 100 shares for $1 and company B has 50 shares for $2, both of their market caps equal $100. Here is the most basic example of what I'm trying to prove: And really, I'm only writing this because I'm tired of having to explain it, so from now on, I can just link this to them instead. Here are some examples of exchanges I have had recently that pissed me off enough to spend almost two hours sifting through data and subsequently writing up a 'DD' about it. or fortunately wrong depending on how you want to look at it.

But since our world has logic and concepts, they are unfortunately wrong. Recently, I've been arguing with internet finance professionals over the overused and misunderstood argument of 'POPCORN is a cheaper stock to own than GME' or 'Why would I buy 1 GME share when I can have 10 POPCORN shares?' or my personal favorite 'if both stocks go to $10,000 at one point in the squeeze, than which one makes more sense to buy now you fucking idiot?!?!'.Īll of which are valid arguments if you have no understanding of equity or market capitalization.

Popcorn and tv